Search and rescue helicopter |
A letter sent to Chico, California’s Enterprise-Record:
I'm glad to see that
the story about Robert Marmon, the lost hiker, had a happy ending. His frozen,
partially eaten body could have easily been the lead story of the paper during
spring thaw in March.
Hiking cross country
by yourself in winter conditions and at high elevations defies logic and common
sense. Did he not check the weather forecast? Apparently he did not have a
spare set of dry clothes. Did he not think he would get wet on that trip? What
was he thinking?
He apologized to the
cabin owner for breaking in but no mention was made of an apology to the search
and rescue team and helicopter pilot for putting their lives at risk to save
his sorry self.
I certainly hope he is
sent a bill for the thousands of dollars of expense that it cost to conduct the
search.
Marmon, a resident of Chico, had been missing for three days
before search and rescue located him on Christmas Eve in several feet of snow.
He had broken into a cabin to survive after attempting to hike a portion of the
Pacific Crest Trail.
According to a Time magazine article, the U.S. National Park
Service spends nearly $5 million annually on search and rescue (SAR) missions.
This doesn’t include the man hours going into these searches. Unless a park
rule has been violated, those rescued are not responsible for the cost. This means
that you and I pay for the cost of these rescues in National Parks.
In Wyoming’s Teton County, the search and rescue crew works
in conjunction with the county sheriff. Each year, they conduct an average of
70 rescues. While most rescuers are volunteers, costs associated with leasing a
helicopter and maintaining equipment accumulate. Apparently, those rescued are
charged for helicopter flight time of $1,600 per hour, but payment is not
strictly enforced.
Wary of being charged for a rescue, some outdoor enthusiasts
have refused help, saying they couldn’t afford to pay for the rescue.
Currently, six states allow for billing of search and rescue
operations to some degree. Oregon is one of them (New Hampshire, Hawaii,
Vermont, Idaho, Colorado are the others).
In Oregon, a public body that has authority to conduct
search and rescue activities may collect no more than $500 from each individual
rescued and no more than the actual cost of the SAR operation from all
individuals rescued. Furthermore, the body can only obtain reimbursement when “reasonable
care was not exercised by the individuals for whose benefit the search and
rescue activities are conducted; or applicable laws were violated by such
individuals."
“Reasonable care” is defined as the possession and use of
equipment appropriate for the weather conditions and terrain, attempts to use
locating devices or cellular phones when appropriate, notifying individuals of
expected return times and planned locations and routes, and possession of maps
and orienteering equipment appropriate for the conditions.